Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 898
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $3,660,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joyce A Barfield | Dawson, GA 39842 | $10,091 |
82 | Spilman Family Farm LLC | Dawson, GA 39842 | $9,875 |
83 | Marilyn Ann Myler | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $9,802 |
84 | Goolsby Farms | Dawson, GA 39842 | $9,765 |
85 | Daley Trust | Blakely, GA 39823 | $9,695 |
86 | Phillip D Hajek | Albany, GA 31721 | $9,679 |
87 | Lake Sharon Properties Inc | Albany, GA 31708 | $9,664 |
88 | B F Betts Jr | Tallahassee, FL 32308 | $9,657 |
89 | Five Mile Place LLC | Atlanta, GA 30339 | $9,619 |
90 | Bernice S Wiley | Smithville, GA 31787 | $9,608 |
91 | Spring Creek Land Co LLC | Albany, GA 31708 | $9,564 |
92 | Lola Godfrey | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $9,523 |
93 | Heard Heritage LLC | Marietta, GA 30068 | $9,398 |
94 | Raymond & Lauren Geiger Inc | Tallahassee, FL 32308 | $9,392 |
95 | Richard Zachery Palm | Dothan, AL 36303 | $9,372 |
96 | Daniel Jackson Mims | Albany, GA 31721 | $9,351 |
97 | Kate Carter Mitchell | Jakin, GA 39861 | $9,176 |
98 | Wall Investments LLC | Albany, GA 31721 | $9,135 |
99 | Carol Vizzini | Bonaire, GA 31005 | $9,040 |
100 | , | $8,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”