Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 14,772

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $1,920,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
81Charles B & Jimmy L LaneBainbridge, GA 39817$2,875,067
82Showtime Farms General PartnershipBronwood, GA 39826$2,846,400
83Mathis Farm General PartnersArlington, GA 39813$2,804,176
84James Raymond PeavyCuthbert, GA 39840$2,766,291
85Chris Thompson FarmsMidland City, AL 36350$2,725,120
86Rolling Hills Farm IncColquitt, GA 39837$2,723,480
87Nelson Hattaway FarmsBlakely, GA 39823$2,695,577
88Michael Lee GrebelArlington, GA 39813$2,688,697
89Ragan Farm PartnershipEdison, GA 39846$2,683,218
90Thomas Augustus RaganEdison, GA 39846$2,671,069
91J R Curry III FarmsShellman, GA 39886$2,667,188
92Alton Breedlove JrDawson, GA 39842$2,565,958
93Gamble Farms IncDawson, GA 39842$2,547,826
94Mark & Vicki Merritt FarmsColquitt, GA 31737$2,543,450
95Milliron Farms IncShellman, GA 39886$2,532,977
96Terry Phillips FarmsClimax, GA 39834$2,510,385
97C&t IncArlington, GA 39813$2,506,546
98William Malcolm Perry JrLeslie, GA 31764$2,505,155
99J R Curry Farms IncShellman, GA 39886$2,500,524
100D & P FarmsIron City, GA 39859$2,471,283

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag