Cotton Ginning Program in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 581

Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $13,349,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Ginning Program
1995-2023
141Arnold Brothers Farm PartnershipShellman, GA 39886$27,264
1423e Miller Farms IncIron City, GA 39859$27,179
143Tony S BrunerBlakely, GA 39823$27,036
144Jed Daniel Farms GpDawson, GA 39842$26,890
145Roy F Daniel JrAmericus, GA 31709$26,651
146Clenney Hill FarmsColquitt, GA 39837$26,588
147B & B Farms BrownleeBlakely, GA 39823$26,546
148James Huston Paul JrDawson, GA 39842$26,485
149Steve Brock Farms GpClimax, GA 39834$26,432
150Hargrove Farms IncEdison, GA 39846$26,140
151Rodney E JoinerEdison, GA 39846$26,104
152Harris Devane Farms PartnershipCuthbert, GA 39840$26,072
153Branda Trawick Jr And Atherlone Trawick Dba Four OIron City, GA 39859$25,942
154Don E BridgesDawson, GA 39842$25,855
155O'hearn Farms PartnershipShellman, GA 39886$25,760
156Jim SellarsEllaville, GA 31806$25,517
157Ragan Farm PartnershipEdison, GA 39846$25,436
158Julian Fletcher Cosby JrSmithville, GA 31787$25,367
159Brantley Broome Farms IncDonalsonville, GA 39845$25,300
160Diane Stuart LLCBrinson, GA 39825$25,226

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag