Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 899
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $3,663,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mclendon Farm Inc | Dawson, GA 39842 | $7,049 |
142 | Gary S Cromer | Ellaville, GA 31806 | $7,026 |
143 | Cjr Brim, LLC | Gainesville, GA 30501 | $6,945 |
144 | Cleveland Trulock Family Farm LLC | Savannah, GA 31406 | $6,910 |
145 | , | $6,910 | |
146 | Herbert E Perry Jr | Mayo, FL 32066 | $6,874 |
147 | Knighton Land Holding LLC | Cowarts, AL 36321 | $6,874 |
148 | John C Sanders | Fort Gaines, GA 39851 | $6,815 |
149 | Christopher Scott Gilley | Dawson, GA 39842 | $6,800 |
150 | Timothy R Hall | Albany, GA 31721 | $6,758 |
151 | Bear's Head Partners LLC | Ty Ty, GA 31795 | $6,755 |
152 | Nika Properties LLC | Vienna, GA 31092 | $6,726 |
153 | Wisenberg Forest Company, LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $6,714 |
154 | Mays Farm LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $6,690 |
155 | , | $6,673 | |
156 | Industry Service And Development | Atlanta, GA 30328 | $6,655 |
157 | L&b Property Holdings LLC | Bainbridge, GA 39819 | $6,636 |
158 | Fletcher Brothers Farm LLC | Dawson, GA 39842 | $6,625 |
159 | Timothy L Smith Sr. Defective Grantor Trust | Bainbridge, GA 39818 | $6,590 |
160 | Daniel B Webb | Dawson, GA 39842 | $6,544 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”