Cotton Ginning Program in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 581
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $13,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Collins Farms | Edison, GA 39846 | $23,136 |
182 | Bill Newman Farms LLC | Dawson, GA 39842 | $22,973 |
183 | S Shane Kelley Farms Inc | Newton, GA 39870 | $22,910 |
184 | Jones Brothers Farms | Weston, GA 31832 | $22,728 |
185 | Big Pond Farms | Damascus, GA 39841 | $22,626 |
186 | Kevin & Charity Tabb Farms | Damascus, GA 39841 | $22,586 |
187 | John Odom Farms Inc | Blakely, GA 39823 | $22,520 |
188 | L & L Farms Inc | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $22,288 |
189 | Bodrey Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $22,036 |
190 | George Larsen II | De Soto, GA 31743 | $21,812 |
191 | Robert Bridges Fletcher | Americus, GA 31719 | $21,630 |
192 | Diamond Partners Gp | Lumpkin, GA 31815 | $21,609 |
193 | Bobby Barber Jr | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $21,569 |
194 | William C Brewer | Americus, GA 31709 | $21,553 |
195 | Rgt Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $21,144 |
196 | Chad Brooks Farms | Edison, GA 39846 | $21,116 |
197 | Leeland Farms Inc | Dawson, GA 39842 | $21,093 |
198 | Pine Ridge Farm Ltd | Fort Gaines, GA 39851 | $21,088 |
199 | Braswell Family Farms LLC | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $21,036 |
200 | Jones-long Farm LLC | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $20,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”