Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 4,635

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $120,612,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
181Simmons Agency IncAmericus, GA 31709$124,161
182James F TaylorAlbany, GA 31702$124,048
183Patricia H HeltonRocky Face, GA 30740$123,737
184Hubert L BrockBainbridge, GA 39817$123,717
185Gordon L ChapmanDawson, GA 39842$123,675
186Nehme Holdings LLCStuart, FL 34996$123,077
187Newberry Angus Farms IncColquitt, GA 39837$123,042
188James C GatewoodAmericus, GA 31709$122,978
189Laura Clements DixonSaint Simons Island, GA 31522$122,738
190Fuqua Properties LLCPittsboro, NC 27312$122,359
191Neil WingfieldLeesburg, GA 31763$121,821
192Kenneth J HartmanAlpharetta, GA 30022$121,323
193Mark Andrews RoseLakeland, FL 33809$120,696
194Bragg Properties LLCHomewood, AL 35209$120,612
195Sam LewisMacon, GA 31210$120,003
196Pachitla Creek Plantation IncBlakely, GA 31723$119,873
197Erik VonkRichland, GA 31825$119,779
198Duskin Farm Partnership LLCDawson, GA 39842$119,709
199Earl S Williams JrAmericus, GA 31709$119,386
200Goolsby Properties LLCDawson, GA 39842$118,728

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag