Cotton Ginning Program in 10th District of Georgia (Rep. Jody Hice), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 10th District of Georgia (Rep. Jody Hice) totaled $264,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Benjamin C Hadden | Gibson, GA 30810 | $43,291 |
2 | Bobby L Williams | Gibson, GA 30810 | $40,000 |
3 | Ruark Farms | Bostwick, GA 30623 | $38,134 |
4 | Ruark Brothers | Bishop, GA 30621 | $28,760 |
5 | Charles H Hall Jr | Norwood, GA 30821 | $24,411 |
6 | Shepherd Farms LLC | Rutledge, GA 30663 | $14,426 |
7 | Wade Rabun | Warrenton, GA 30828 | $10,456 |
8 | Ronnie H Hadden | Gibson, GA 30810 | $10,200 |
9 | Barnett H Malcom III | Madison, GA 30650 | $8,956 |
10 | Austin B Kelley | Gibson, GA 30810 | $7,247 |
11 | Hunter Anthony Gray | Warrenton, GA 30828 | $6,563 |
12 | Ainslie Scott Porter | Buckhead, GA 30625 | $4,421 |
13 | Charles Lee Hall | Norwood, GA 30821 | $3,074 |
14 | Ezekiel Roy Lambert III | Madison, GA 30650 | $3,020 |
15 | Jack Ray Farm Lllp | Richmond, VA 23226 | $3,016 |
16 | Walter Alan Shepherd | Rutledge, GA 30663 | $2,935 |
17 | Luke William Davis | Warrenton, GA 30828 | $2,715 |
18 | Jeffery Donald Thomas II | Good Hope, GA 30641 | $2,344 |
19 | Dan Chalker | Stapleton, GA 30823 | $2,321 |
20 | Sidney Walker | Rayle, GA 30660 | $2,046 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>