Emergency Conservation Program in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 577

Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $18,898,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Conservation Program
1995-2023
21Thomas Dean KanihoNaalehu, HI 96772$199,998
22J Hanoa Cattle Co LLCPahala, HI 96777$182,274
23Bryant Jerome AzevedoHilo, HI 96720$180,964
24Kahua Ranch LimitedKamuela, HI 96743$180,479
25Benjamin Felix FrazierKurtistown, HI 96760$179,545
26Patrick Daniel LauKamuela, HI 96743$177,189
27Barbara A K Nobriga & Elizabeth K Nobriga Etal PtrKealakekua, HI 96750$175,829
28Aileen K F Wung YehHilo, HI 96720$173,495
29Richard A JohansenNaalehu, HI 96772$169,628
30Charles Tatsuo OnakaHonaunau, HI 96726$156,539
31IascoBurlingame, CA 94010$155,057
32Hoilina Ranch LLCKailua Kona, HI 96745$153,687
33Jeanette C KanihoNaalehu, HI 96772$149,863
34John L RoganVolcano, HI 96785$147,602
35Jeremy Scott Masato LewisKailua Kona, HI 96740$144,483
36Lawrence Costa JrKurtistown, HI 96760$139,353
37Kenneth M VeroskoCaptain Cook, HI 96704$139,252
38Ulupalakua Ranch IncKula, HI 96790$136,787
39Alfred GalimbaNaalehu, HI 96772$135,409
40Viktoria V AntovaMountain View, HI 96771$129,436

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag