Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 271
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $595,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Howards Nurseries Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $5,753 |
22 | Steven Chaikin | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $5,753 |
23 | Alfred Galimba | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $5,753 |
24 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $5,753 |
25 | Bryan Takeshi Otani | Makawao, HI 96768 | $5,753 |
26 | James C Sakugawa & Sons | Kula, HI 96790 | $5,753 |
27 | Maui Floral Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $5,753 |
28 | Purdyco Ltd Dba Island Princess | Honolulu, HI 96819 | $5,753 |
29 | Pukalani Plant Company Inc | Pukalani, HI 96788 | $5,753 |
30 | Bryant Jerome Azevedo | Hilo, HI 96720 | $5,753 |
31 | Agee Inc | Ninole, HI 96773 | $5,753 |
32 | Island Harvest Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $5,753 |
33 | Kawamata Farms LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $5,753 |
34 | Alohilani Orchids Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $5,753 |
35 | Newman's Nursery, Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $5,753 |
36 | Hirako Farms Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $5,753 |
37 | Proteas Of Hawaii LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $5,753 |
38 | Emily Jo Taaroa | Keaau, HI 96749 | $5,753 |
39 | Gregory J K Garcia Sr | Glide, OR 97443 | $5,753 |
40 | A & T Belmes Farm LLC | Keaau, HI 96749 | $5,753 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”