Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 719
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $6,435,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Green Enterprises Inc | Kilauea, HI 96754 | $41,360 |
42 | Philip David Battam Davies | Kilauea, HI 96754 | $41,336 |
43 | Novelty Greens LLC | Hilo, HI 96720 | $40,267 |
44 | Loe Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $39,752 |
45 | Michael P Mccoy | Makawao, HI 96768 | $39,220 |
46 | Tu Thanh Nguyen | Hakalau, HI 96710 | $38,624 |
47 | Afa Maiu'u Tuaolo | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $38,357 |
48 | Robert Ito Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $38,023 |
49 | Kaupo Ranch Ltd | Lihue, HI 96766 | $37,668 |
50 | Y Hirayama Farm Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $37,623 |
51 | Tropical Flowers And Bouquets Of | Hana, HI 96713 | $37,542 |
52 | Ono Organic Farms Inc | Hana, HI 96713 | $37,331 |
53 | Evonuk Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $37,201 |
54 | Volcano Isle Fruit Co. Inc. | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $37,098 |
55 | Nobrigas Ranch Inc | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $36,496 |
56 | Yoshio Inouye Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $36,485 |
57 | Brendan L Balthazar | Makawao, HI 96768 | $35,747 |
58 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $35,628 |
59 | Zbar Ranch LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $35,415 |
60 | Steven Chaikin | Kaunakakai, HI 96748 | $34,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”