Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Hawaii
(Rep. Tulsi Gabbard)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,457
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $184,769,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diamond B Ranch LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $825,384 |
42 | Purdyco Ltd Dba Island Princess | Honolulu, HI 96819 | $801,654 |
43 | F Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96740 | $784,730 |
44 | Parker Ranch Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $772,180 |
45 | Lanai Institute For The Environm | Lanai City, HI 96763 | $763,871 |
46 | Loe Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $745,878 |
47 | Calvin Riley Louis | Pahala, HI 96777 | $744,581 |
48 | , | $713,904 | |
49 | Island Dairy Inc | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $654,609 |
50 | Hoilina Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $653,342 |
51 | Stanton I Loo | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $642,609 |
52 | Island Harvest Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $636,796 |
53 | Richard A Johansen | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $592,292 |
54 | Smart Direct,llc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $591,574 |
55 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $590,148 |
56 | Minh Voss | Hilo, HI 96720 | $586,657 |
57 | Merle Becker | Pahala, HI 96777 | $586,383 |
58 | Charles Tatsuo Onaka | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $565,401 |
59 | Wailea Agricultural Group Inc | Honomu, HI 96728 | $559,140 |
60 | Clarence S. Rapoza | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $557,223 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”