Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 61
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $247,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $1,190 | |
42 | Kona Hills Coffee LLC | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $1,115 |
43 | Annie E Ridgely- Ohana Mac Nut Farm LLC | Pahala, HI 96777 | $1,076 |
44 | , | $1,025 | |
45 | Edison B Ganot | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $1,012 |
46 | Alexander Calumpit | Pahala, HI 96777 | $686 |
47 | Marcos Domingo Jr | Pahala, HI 96777 | $649 |
48 | Ferol Ann White | Honomu, HI 96728 | $641 |
49 | Jed Tito Susa Ramos | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $512 |
50 | John T Kihara | Hilo, HI 96720 | $455 |
51 | Kundalini Of Kona Inc | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $424 |
52 | Debra Dumaguin | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $381 |
53 | Pamela Greenaway | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $330 |
54 | Victoriano Pinzon | Pahala, HI 96777 | $314 |
55 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $313 |
56 | Samuel H Taka | Hilo, HI 96720 | $287 |
57 | Waikoekoe Cattle Co Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $286 |
58 | Artemio Sibucao | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $228 |
59 | Donald J Pascual | Keaau, HI 96749 | $123 |
60 | Rachel Louise Leyva | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $25 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”