Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 473
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $1,056,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cabaero Farm LLC | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $3,411 |
82 | Gregory J K Garcia Sr | Glide, OR 97443 | $3,383 |
83 | Trinidad Marques | Pahala, HI 96777 | $3,368 |
84 | Zbar Ranch LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $3,176 |
85 | Koga Farms Inc | Kilauea, HI 96754 | $3,169 |
86 | Lopes Farm LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $3,139 |
87 | Bryant Jerome Azevedo | Hilo, HI 96720 | $3,132 |
88 | Kapaa Banana Co Inc | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $3,114 |
89 | Tai Nguyen | Pepeekeo, HI 96783 | $3,094 |
90 | Jimmy Valenzuela Bernardo Jr | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $3,041 |
91 | Lordson Bernardo | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $2,963 |
92 | Elmer Tubban Viernes | Lihue, HI 96766 | $2,891 |
93 | Palekoki Ranch Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $2,888 |
94 | Floral Resources/hawaii Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $2,847 |
95 | John D Byrd Jr | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $2,819 |
96 | Wirat Yothachai | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $2,774 |
97 | Daryl W Kaneshiro | Koloa, HI 96756 | $2,757 |
98 | Rincon Family Farm Inc. | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $2,744 |
99 | Gloria Que Camba | Pahala, HI 96777 | $2,742 |
100 | F Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96740 | $2,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”