Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Hawaii
(Rep. Tulsi Gabbard)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,457
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $184,769,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | J Hanoa Cattle Co LLC | Pahala, HI 96777 | $404,445 |
102 | William Gerard Jacintho | Kula, HI 96790 | $401,978 |
103 | Orchid Plantation Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $396,828 |
104 | Five-o Cattle Co LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $383,669 |
105 | M&m Five Star Cattle LLC | Escalon, CA 95320 | $381,500 |
106 | Aileen K F Wung Yeh | Hilo, HI 96720 | $377,565 |
107 | Nobrigas Ranch Inc | Wailuku, HI 96793 | $375,686 |
108 | Orchids Paradise LLC | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $375,476 |
109 | Bryan Takeshi Otani | Makawao, HI 96768 | $369,046 |
110 | George Michael Olival | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $358,909 |
111 | Elmer S Pitpit | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $353,405 |
112 | Kenneth M Verosko | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $352,229 |
113 | Samuel H Taka | Hilo, HI 96720 | $349,760 |
114 | Jill J Mattos | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $349,591 |
115 | Grace Pasion | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $346,565 |
116 | Richard W Kaniho | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $344,703 |
117 | Jimmy T Bernardo | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $342,658 |
118 | Jason Alexander Mattos Sr | Hilo, HI 96720 | $341,183 |
119 | Stephen De Luz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $340,383 |
120 | , | $339,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”