Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Hawaii
(Rep. Tulsi Gabbard)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 529
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $13,964,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Richard A Johansen | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $27,129 |
102 | Clayson K Stone | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $26,929 |
103 | Ge Farms Inc | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $26,905 |
104 | Jianjun Zhang | Papaikou, HI 96781 | $26,804 |
105 | J9 Ranch LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $25,992 |
106 | Antone J Reis Jr | Kealia, HI 96751 | $25,898 |
107 | Leslie P Milnes | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $25,355 |
108 | Atto Assi | Mountain View, HI 96771 | $24,030 |
109 | Sheila Chambers Dba Lehua Ranch | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $24,012 |
110 | Rory James Souza | Makawao, HI 96768 | $23,736 |
111 | Onaka Ranch Inc | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $23,526 |
112 | Keane Iranon | Volcano, HI 96785 | $23,303 |
113 | Hind Daleico LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $23,259 |
114 | Marla Fergerstrom | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $22,873 |
115 | Walter D Child III | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $22,436 |
116 | Moana Lois Kinimaka Palama | Koloa, HI 96756 | $22,252 |
117 | Jonathan Kimo Akita | Kalaheo, HI 96741 | $21,472 |
118 | Charles Lindsey | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $21,040 |
119 | Bigway, LLC | Honolulu, HI 96816 | $20,738 |
120 | Orlando Manuel | Keaau, HI 96749 | $20,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”