CCC Organic Programs in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $24,499 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hawaii Harvest Honey, LLC | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $1,500 |
2 | Volcano Island Honey Co LLC Dba Rare Hawaiian Hone | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $1,000 |
3 | Crown Pacific International | Hilo, HI 96720 | $1,000 |
4 | Elizabeth S Ward | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $1,000 |
5 | Healing Noni Co. LLC | Hilo, HI 96720 | $1,000 |
6 | Palani Farms LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $1,000 |
7 | Andrew Lafayette | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $1,000 |
8 | Konalicious Organic Coffee LLC | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $1,000 |
9 | Mahina Mele Farms LLC | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $1,000 |
10 | Evonuk Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $825 |
11 | Albertina Sloan | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $687 |
12 | Colehour J Bondera | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $643 |
13 | Ronald E. Peters | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $619 |
14 | Bruce Corker Dba Rancho Aloha | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $618 |
15 | Robert Jacobson | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $550 |
16 | Howard James | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $500 |
17 | Kenneth Masao Okamura | Kula, HI 96790 | $500 |
18 | Kealaola Farm LLC | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $500 |
19 | Chad Wasserman | Hilo, HI 96720 | $500 |
20 | Aama Organic Farm LLC | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>