Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Iowa (Rep. Abby Finkenauer), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,435
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Iowa (Rep. Abby Finkenauer) totaled $21,391,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L.c. Klink Family Trust U/d/t Dated March 25, 1998 | Elkader, IA 52043 | $45,692 |
22 | John A Nurre | Strawberry Point, IA 52076 | $44,807 |
23 | John Moore | Volga, IA 52077 | $44,668 |
24 | Ivanell Dinan | Elkader, IA 52043 | $43,781 |
25 | Ilona Durey | Manchester, IA 52057 | $43,600 |
26 | Steven B Fleming | Lamont, IA 50650 | $43,285 |
27 | Marsha K Fleming | Lamont, IA 50650 | $43,285 |
28 | Schoien Family Farms | Dubuque, IA 52002 | $43,272 |
29 | Shirley A Grover Estate | Cedar Rapids, IA 52401 | $43,172 |
30 | Frances P Hettinger | Manchester, IA 52057 | $43,164 |
31 | Ds Kaiser Farms LLC | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $42,875 |
32 | Gregory Whittle | Altoona, IA 50009 | $42,487 |
33 | Dolores M Boehm | Wadena, IA 52169 | $42,450 |
34 | Jacob Hart | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $42,372 |
35 | Community Savings Bank ** | Marathon, IA 50565 | $42,255 |
36 | Pate Ag Llp | Farmersburg, IA 52047 | $42,064 |
37 | Roger Nilus Tieskoetter | Postville, IA 52162 | $41,931 |
38 | R Lyle Schroeder | Garber, IA 52048 | $41,620 |
39 | Bernard F Fangman | Elkader, IA 52043 | $41,540 |
40 | Larry Lincoln | Strawberry Point, IA 52076 | $41,497 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”