Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 19,714

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,107,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21James W Schultz Irrevocable TrustDelano, MN 55328$961,360
22Orletha RobertsonColumbus Junction, IA 52738$941,732
23Scott L MccoyExline, IA 52555$938,494
24Charles D BruggemeyerMount Pleasant, IA 52641$938,148
25Cobb FarmsLitchfield Pk, AZ 85340$934,011
26Robert B KingChariton, IA 50049$933,295
27Hooks Lonesome Pine Farm IncWapello, IA 52653$924,925
28John E BiceStockport, IA 52651$915,613
29Henderson Farms IncMilton, IA 52570$911,220
30Verl Jr JacksonHedrick, IA 52563$903,620
31Americo R LagoneMuscatine, IA 52761$901,633
32Stephen J MullahyBurlington, IA 52601$901,601
33Alan GravettOttumwa, IA 52501$870,265
34Thomas L KaldenbergAlbia, IA 52531$868,220
35David A BethardsGarden Grove, IA 50103$865,089
36Patrick O MullahyBurlington, IA 52601$862,306
37Interstate Land And Investment CoWashington, IA 52353$859,511
38William J Mceniry Revocable TrustNorth Aurora, IL 60542$858,733
39Warren L McconahayColumbus City, IA 52737$843,883
40Richard E Jerels JrPlymouth, OH 44865$837,381

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag