Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 790
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $14,959,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Josh Randal Wells | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $59,616 |
62 | Npkk Pork LLC | Washington, IA 52353 | $58,809 |
63 | Metairie Ltd | Middletown, IA 52638 | $57,958 |
64 | Porter Farms | Mercer, MO 64661 | $54,844 |
65 | Nelco Farms Inc | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $54,215 |
66 | Tybrooke Farms Inc | Stockton, IA 52769 | $54,036 |
67 | Davis Bros Farms Inc | Moulton, IA 52572 | $52,933 |
68 | E & J Millage LLC | Kersey, CO 80644 | $52,545 |
69 | Pomberg Farms | West Point, IA 52656 | $51,907 |
70 | Dennis Richard Hetzler | Muscatine, IA 52761 | $51,205 |
71 | Schomberg Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $50,721 |
72 | Stephen L Settles | Winfield, IA 52659 | $50,071 |
73 | David W Oberbroeckling | Davenport, IA 52806 | $49,336 |
74 | Kathy Ann Mcneal | Letts, IA 52754 | $49,315 |
75 | Michael O'toole | Letts, IA 52754 | $48,344 |
76 | William B Furlong | Iowa City, IA 52246 | $48,246 |
77 | Rolling S Farms Inc | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $47,836 |
78 | Mallams Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $47,772 |
79 | Jerald Roger Gipple | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $47,722 |
80 | Gary Jay Settles | Winfield, IA 52659 | $47,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”