Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 15,565
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $399,168,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ricky Allan Wirt | Burlington, IA 52601 | $371,080 |
62 | Dennis E Anderson | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $370,978 |
63 | Ronald F Denning | New London, IA 52645 | $366,511 |
64 | Bieri Farms Inc | Letts, IA 52754 | $365,239 |
65 | Bobkat Acres | Mechanicsville, IA 52306 | $361,560 |
66 | Alan G Curtis | Long Grove, IA 52756 | $359,964 |
67 | Mcmichael Farms Inc | Atalissa, IA 52720 | $358,903 |
68 | A & R Enterprise Ltd | Fort Madison, IA 52627 | $358,273 |
69 | Fredrick Lynn Zeitler | Douds, IA 52551 | $357,590 |
70 | Joshua Richard Durflinger | Eldon, IA 52554 | $357,330 |
71 | Quinn Ag Enterprises Ltd | Durant, IA 52747 | $354,651 |
72 | Davis Bros Farms Inc | Moulton, IA 52572 | $352,212 |
73 | Albert Hess | Princeton, IA 52768 | $351,008 |
74 | Mary Hess | Princeton, IA 52768 | $351,008 |
75 | Nesretep Farms Inc | Davenport, IA 52804 | $349,523 |
76 | Forrest Lewis Brown | Letts, IA 52754 | $347,061 |
77 | D W Lain | Plano, IA 52581 | $343,645 |
78 | Lilienthal Enterprises Ltd | Durant, IA 52747 | $342,568 |
79 | Mark Breder Ltd | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $341,508 |
80 | Richard G Hemphill | Davenport, IA 52807 | $340,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”