Market Gains in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,455
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $39,938,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Timothy Lee Maxwell | Moscow, IA 52760 | $89,451 |
62 | John Beach | Fort Madison, IA 52627 | $88,842 |
63 | James L Johnson | Burlington, IA 52601 | $88,473 |
64 | Don And Bill Adam Inc | Richland, IA 52585 | $88,470 |
65 | Peiffer Farms Inc | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $87,685 |
66 | Magnolia Crest Farms | Davenport, IA 52807 | $86,438 |
67 | Carter Farms Ltd | Princeton, IA 52768 | $86,392 |
68 | Thomas L Maxwell | Moscow, IA 52760 | $85,764 |
69 | Rickie Lee Reno | Humeston, IA 50123 | $85,702 |
70 | William Reesink Inc | Muscatine, IA 52761 | $83,831 |
71 | Gary Lagerstrom | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $83,498 |
72 | Leon Durflinger | Batavia, IA 52533 | $83,356 |
73 | Brian Lee Hayes | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $82,828 |
74 | Mark Lee Durflinger | Hedrick, IA 52563 | $82,339 |
75 | Paul E Dierickx | Long Grove, IA 52756 | $82,313 |
76 | Bryan J Sievers | Stockton, IA 52769 | $82,182 |
77 | Hoeg Inc | Wapello, IA 52653 | $81,803 |
78 | William Adam | Richland, IA 52585 | $81,336 |
79 | C & A Inc | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $81,135 |
80 | Davis Land & Livestock Inc | Batavia, IA 52533 | $80,711 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”