Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 35,527

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $3,000,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
81Willmark Farms IncorporatedWalcott, IA 52773$1,642,394
82Dennis E AndersonMount Pleasant, IA 52641$1,601,885
83Susan M SchwarzEldridge, IA 52748$1,600,388
84Jack MiddlekoopPackwood, IA 52580$1,595,108
85Allender Farms LtdMount Pleasant, IA 52641$1,591,203
86Parrott Farms IncBurlington, IA 52601$1,590,570
87Mac Farms IncMount Pleasant, IA 52641$1,588,880
88Sycamore Creek Farms IncLe Claire, IA 52753$1,588,142
89Wells Brothers FarmsCincinnati, IA 52549$1,578,712
90J & L FarmsOakville, IA 52646$1,572,453
91Darrell Frank WalkerMorning Sun, IA 52640$1,571,005
92Perkins Land Company IncIowa City, IA 52246$1,569,672
93Maurer Farms PartnershipWilton, IA 52778$1,568,177
94Ross W Tweedy Trust TweedyMt Pleasant, IA 52641$1,565,768
95Meeker Farms CorpOakville, IA 52646$1,559,398
96Shardo Farms LtdLe Claire, IA 52753$1,557,616
97Willhoit Farms IncBatavia, IA 52533$1,552,469
98Robbins Ag IncWapello, IA 52653$1,540,046
99John B Sinclair Revocable TrustAllerton, IA 50008$1,526,463
100Thomas DentHumeston, IA 50123$1,522,426

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag