Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 19,714

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,107,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
81Gary Andrew JohnsonKeokuk, IA 52632$703,131
82Robert LudingtonCorydon, IA 50060$702,776
83Vernon Jackson SwainColumbus Junction, IA 52738$700,410
84Phil GraberMount Pleasant, IA 52641$699,117
85Big Creek Ranch LtdBurlington, IA 52601$698,438
86Max LeydaBloomfield, IA 52537$696,872
87Ralph AlshouseCorydon, IA 50060$691,791
88Stephen C Kyner Revocable Trust DHumeston, IA 50123$686,864
89Robert C Beauchamp & Michelle Beauchamp RevocableWashington, IA 52353$683,555
90D Russell ParkerLovilia, IA 50150$682,802
91Woodrow W Miltenberger TrustClive, IA 50325$678,993
92Gerdner Enterprises CorpBurlington, IA 52601$676,464
93Larry A PearsonNew London, IA 52645$675,574
94Helen M StajcarUdell, IA 52593$670,450
95Thomas E KientzBrighton, IA 52540$669,150
96Mary Wykert Rev TrustMediapolis, IA 52637$667,098
97James W JonesAllerton, IA 50008$666,264
98Gary L FranklinKeosauqua, IA 52565$663,034
99Douglas E Vickstrom TrustBettendorf, IA 52722$662,727
100Dixon Farms IncLaurel, IA 50141$660,622

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag