CCC Organic Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 106
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $191,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Clinton R Calhoun | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $750 |
82 | Blake William Wulf | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $750 |
83 | Tyler Knapp | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $750 |
84 | Dowd International Inc. | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $750 |
85 | Maharishi Ayur-ved Products Inter | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $750 |
86 | David L Glass II | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $750 |
87 | Fairfield Iowa Organic Greenhouse | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $750 |
88 | Mcgee Farms-russell Mc Gee | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $750 |
89 | Russell Mc Gee-dba Mc Gee Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $750 |
90 | Susan J Frye | Walcott, IA 52773 | $750 |
91 | Howard Lee Stutzman | Garden Grove, IA 50103 | $750 |
92 | Rochau Farms Inc | Davenport, IA 52806 | $731 |
93 | Mandde LLC | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $714 |
94 | Jeffrey Frans Olson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $626 |
95 | Morgan Patricia Hoenig | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $541 |
96 | David L Glass II | Wayland, IA 52654 | $533 |
97 | Aden P Helmuth | Corydon, IA 50060 | $524 |
98 | Eugene Matthew Joos | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $500 |
99 | Jesse Lee Rebling | Brighton, IA 52540 | $500 |
100 | Sam Knapp | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”