Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 19,714

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,107,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
101Fullenkamp Farms IncWest Point, IA 52656$659,118
102Rauscher Farms CorpLockridge, IA 52635$658,982
103Dickey IncPackwood, IA 52580$657,722
104Edward M Crall TrustAlbia, IA 52531$654,743
105Thomas A WykertWapello, IA 52653$654,253
106Joseph M Hollinrake TrustLovilia, IA 50150$648,442
107Gary FillingerLockridge, IA 52635$648,269
108Jeffrey L HoustonFort Madison, IA 52627$648,113
109Lawless FarmsAlbia, IA 52531$647,506
110Robert D BruggemeyerMount Pleasant, IA 52641$646,099
111Carol ChickeringBloomfield, IA 52537$645,841
112Victor C ButzMoravia, IA 52571$644,458
113Gary D SmithGarden Grove, IA 50103$643,789
114Ruby L Smith - Ruby L Smith Revocable TrustLeon, IA 50144$642,917
115Clow Family LLCLineville, IA 50147$642,852
116Jeffrey JohnsonBlakesburg, IA 52536$640,020
117Patrick G KesselFairfield, IA 52556$636,872
118Dolores ScieszinskiWest Des Moines, IA 50266$636,669
119Willow Branch Stock Farm IncBloomfield, IA 52537$628,715
120Randy L BethardsCameron, MO 64429$626,834

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag