Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 234
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $447,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Collin Charles Burk | Wever, IA 52658 | $94 |
102 | James Brian Wilson | Milton, IA 52570 | $94 |
103 | Gary A Koonts | Douds, IA 52551 | $92 |
104 | Philip E Strait | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $86 |
105 | Drew Michael Ostrander | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $86 |
106 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $72 |
107 | Curtis J Richers | Wever, IA 52658 | $65 |
108 | James E Richers | Wever, IA 52658 | $65 |
109 | Patricia S Richers | Wever, IA 52658 | $65 |
110 | Elizabeth Richers | Wever, IA 52658 | $65 |
111 | Daniel Lee Beasley | Batavia, IA 52533 | $64 |
112 | Andrew Steven Lydolph | Stockport, IA 52651 | $64 |
113 | Rachael Jane Sathoff | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $61 |
114 | Elliott R Remick | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $61 |
115 | Carson John Remick | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $61 |
116 | Koellner Brothers Ltd | Milton, IA 52570 | $57 |
117 | Eric D Bales | Milton, IA 52570 | $56 |
118 | Grant A Carter | Stockport, IA 52651 | $53 |
119 | Harold Mathias | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $52 |
120 | Ira A Vancuren | Birmingham, IA 52535 | $51 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”