Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 19,714

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,107,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
121Geraldine CraneDouds, IA 52551$625,216
122John A HoroskySaint Peters, PA 19470$623,718
123Melvin - Hepker Revo L HepkerWest Liberty, IA 52776$623,644
124Larry L MartleyCorydon, IA 50060$622,084
125David L Kent TrustCorydon, IA 50060$620,263
126Lamis Farms IncAgency, IA 52530$616,405
127Brenda M ClarkCedar Falls, IA 50613$616,316
128Nine Eagles Trading Post LtdDavis City, IA 50065$616,083
129K Charles Warner JrBonaparte, IA 52620$613,229
130Steven N ReblingBrighton, IA 52540$609,871
131The O'grady Family TrustGrand River, IA 50108$609,806
132James E PierceallMilton, IA 52570$609,180
133Ernest F ScottDecatur, IA 50067$608,197
134Paul L Fountain IIDouds, IA 52551$606,661
135Paul - Stamler Livin Stamler JrMuscatine, IA 52761$601,763
136Clell Dean MooreAllerton, IA 50008$600,701
137James William ZaputilMystic, IA 52574$598,554
138Nancy JonesAllerton, IA 50008$598,237
139Justin R DeutschFairfield, IA 52556$596,947
140Marshall E Johnson IIIMunith, MI 49259$594,124

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag