Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,036
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $47,756,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fobb LLC | East Quogue, NY 11942 | $49,830 |
22 | Timothy Joseph Murphy | Des Moines, IA 50321 | $49,749 |
23 | Kathleen Crall Trust | Albia, IA 52531 | $49,717 |
24 | Philip D Lyon Revocable Trust | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $49,635 |
25 | Burton A Prunty | Allerton, IA 50008 | $49,589 |
26 | Ralph Alshouse | Corydon, IA 50060 | $49,520 |
27 | George A Plecker Estate | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $49,376 |
28 | Dolores Scieszinski | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $49,323 |
29 | Jls Farms Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $49,321 |
30 | Hollinrake Family Farms LLC | Lovilia, IA 50150 | $49,314 |
31 | Vir-jo Farms Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $49,140 |
32 | Spencer Lee Bartholomew | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $49,129 |
33 | Wenda M Dixon | Iowa City, IA 52245 | $49,111 |
34 | Norman Allen Vote | Melrose, IA 52569 | $49,080 |
35 | Lamis Farms Inc | Agency, IA 52530 | $48,888 |
36 | Janet Distelhorst | Salem, IA 52649 | $48,664 |
37 | Lavon Haines | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $48,376 |
38 | Russell Gene Pierson | Garden Grove, IA 50103 | $48,088 |
39 | Southern Iowa Unlimited LLC | Urbandale, IA 50323 | $48,087 |
40 | Jacob Eli Tweedy | Bethalto, IL 62010 | $47,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”