Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20,215

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $1,115,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Ross W Tweedy Trust TweedyMt Pleasant, IA 52641$1,561,008
2Gabeline Family FarmsYarmouth, IA 52660$1,374,262
3Mabeus Farms IncWever, IA 52658$1,343,514
4John B Sinclair Revocable TrustAllerton, IA 50008$1,307,516
5Wildlands For The Future LtdMarion, IA 52302$1,272,529
6Ronald PickardFairfield, IA 52556$1,251,895
7Arthur MccreaDelavan, IL 61734$1,223,368
8Philip D Lyon Revocable TrustOttumwa, IA 52501$1,194,299
9Robert L DeutschFairfield, IA 52556$1,139,323
10Michael J KuceraGarden Grove, IA 50103$1,126,248
11Jls Farms IncMediapolis, IA 52637$1,065,395
12Larry D AndersonBrighton, IA 52540$1,035,284
13Perkins Land Company IncIowa City, IA 52246$1,028,176
14Howard W EvittCorydon, IA 50060$1,022,957
15Hollinrake Family Farms LLCLovilia, IA 50150$1,005,197
16F J StajcarUdell, IA 52593$1,001,651
17Fred L HickenbottomFairfield, IA 52556$994,705
18Vaughn Bernard FaberBlakesburg, IA 52536$977,455
19Kevin P HassevoortLeon, IA 50144$975,896
20Hohl LllpDonnellson, IA 52625$968,147

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag