Market Gains in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,956
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $33,599,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Francis Rainforth | Sharpsburg, IA 50862 | $160,820 |
22 | Valley Farms Inc | Shenandoah, IA 51601 | $155,661 |
23 | K R C Farms Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $153,762 |
24 | H Charles Brooks | Farragut, IA 51639 | $150,553 |
25 | William James Henderson | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $148,873 |
26 | Schulz Farms Inc | Macksburg, IA 50155 | $144,102 |
27 | James Reed Parrish | Lenox, IA 50851 | $143,893 |
28 | Leo C Kaetzel | Lenox, IA 50851 | $140,302 |
29 | Leroy Stortenbecker | Hastings, IA 51540 | $138,680 |
30 | T D H Johnson | Essex, IA 51638 | $134,136 |
31 | Roger Snyder | Sidney, IA 51652 | $132,786 |
32 | Carl Sidney Johnson | Sidney, IA 51652 | $131,076 |
33 | Phillip Dean Shike | Greenfield, IA 50849 | $129,261 |
34 | Dwight Mellott | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $128,895 |
35 | Lyle Dean Timmerman | Nodaway, IA 50857 | $127,418 |
36 | Jodie Ann Holliday | Greenfield, IA 50849 | $124,642 |
37 | Norman Cleo Houchin | Gravity, IA 50848 | $124,385 |
38 | D Double N Farms Inc | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $123,973 |
39 | Robert Alan Russell | Prescott, IA 50859 | $123,447 |
40 | Rodney G Devries | Elliott, IA 51532 | $121,075 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”