Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Iowa
(Rep. Cynthia Axne)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,062
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $40,300,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Orton Trust | Rochester, MN 55901 | $49,893 |
42 | Robert G Scroggie | Bedford, IA 50833 | $49,886 |
43 | Frank Timothy Dowd Sullivan Trust | Council Bluffs, IA 51503 | $49,824 |
44 | Carolyn K Eblen - Carolyn K Eblen Revocable Trust | Creston, IA 50801 | $49,732 |
45 | Donald J Eblen - Donald J Eblen Revocable Trust | Creston, IA 50801 | $49,732 |
46 | James R Commers Trust | Omaha, NE 68124 | $49,727 |
47 | Mary Ellen Norton | Clarinda, IA 51632 | $49,656 |
48 | T Bar Farms Inc | Lees Summit, MO 64064 | $49,510 |
49 | , | $49,500 | |
50 | , | $49,447 | |
51 | Richard D Dalton Revocable Trust | Lenox, IA 50851 | $49,306 |
52 | S & D Farms LLC | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $49,030 |
53 | Allen E Cox - Allen E Cox Trust | New Market, IA 51646 | $48,792 |
54 | Royce-davis Trust | Des Moines, IA 50310 | $48,591 |
55 | Joel Hardee | Bedford, IA 50833 | $48,524 |
56 | , | $48,524 | |
57 | , | $48,391 | |
58 | Rietkull Inc | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $48,342 |
59 | James Norris | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $48,265 |
60 | Das Cooper Farms Co | Platte City, MO 64079 | $48,070 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”