Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,117
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $30,821,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert West | Malvern, IA 51551 | $48,148 |
42 | Terry F Stock | Papillion, NE 68046 | $48,116 |
43 | Nadine M Stock | Papillion, NE 68046 | $48,116 |
44 | Mary A Scott | Rocheport, MO 65279 | $48,066 |
45 | Richard A Sprague | Bedford, IA 50833 | $47,736 |
46 | Carita A Kelleher Revocable Trust | West Des Moines, IA 50266 | $47,612 |
47 | Cathy L Frisch | Macksburg, IA 50155 | $47,611 |
48 | L J Ripperger | Creston, IA 50801 | $47,546 |
49 | Baur Farms Inc | Van Meter, IA 50261 | $47,219 |
50 | Milton E Blatter | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $47,076 |
51 | Loren Achenbach | Tabor, IA 51653 | $46,480 |
52 | Daniel A Decker | Indianapolis, IN 46203 | $46,403 |
53 | David Earl Nally | Blockton, IA 50836 | $46,341 |
54 | Thielen Living Trust | Murrieta, CA 92562 | $46,104 |
55 | Larry M Carr | Corning, IA 50841 | $46,093 |
56 | H And M Homestead LLC | Creston, IA 50801 | $45,916 |
57 | Lazy Ike Farms LLC | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $45,790 |
58 | James L Meek Irrevocable Trust | Blockton, IA 50836 | $45,625 |
59 | James - James E & Natalie R Gregory Trst Edward Gr | Gretna, NE 68028 | $45,518 |
60 | W E James | Plainfield, IN 46168 | $45,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”