Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 9,991

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $614,889,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
61Vincent Wildin -vincent C. Wildin Revocable TrustWinterset, IA 50273$649,124
62Terry James DammannShenandoah, IA 51601$645,395
63Marjory S BileyPrescott, IA 50859$645,096
64Glenn S RoweLorimor, IA 50149$643,364
65Fredric W DeckerBlockton, IA 50836$639,852
66Roger W SorensenCorning, IA 50841$636,683
67Kahnert Family General PartnershipBlockton, IA 50836$636,456
68Richard G Crouse Rev TrustNodaway, IA 50857$636,314
69John D Gipple Revocable TrustGreenfield, IA 50849$631,090
70James Robert GoodmanCrescent, IA 51526$630,902
71Harmon Farm CorporationNickerson, NE 68044$627,730
72Lyndell V Streebin Revocable TrusBedford, IA 50833$619,823
73Michael G Mullen & Janice I Mullen Revocable TrustCorning, IA 50841$619,669
74Gibson Farms IncCoin, IA 51636$617,164
75Mark A WilliamsAdair, IA 50002$615,436
76Leland Leroy MccuenCorning, IA 50841$614,744
77Max TuckerMacksburg, IA 50155$614,619
78Patrick J BockmanSugar Grove, IL 60554$614,416
79Gary RandelGreenfield, IA 50849$614,373
80Richard L ParsonsNew Market, IA 51646$608,152

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag