Market Gains in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,956
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $33,599,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Donald Earl Vogel | Corning, IA 50841 | $90,502 |
62 | Christie Farming Inc | Clarinda, IA 51632 | $90,152 |
63 | Marvin Focht | Villisca, IA 50864 | $88,744 |
64 | Glq Farms Incorporated | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $88,531 |
65 | Chad Ray Allen | Winterset, IA 50273 | $88,200 |
66 | Gregory J Larson And Jeanie D Larson Living Trust | Clearfield, IA 50840 | $86,186 |
67 | Lawrence David Siverly | Bedford, IA 50833 | $85,525 |
68 | Mark Simmons | Shenandoah, IA 51601 | $83,912 |
69 | Eugene Kuhns | Greenfield, IA 50849 | $82,737 |
70 | Otto F Petersen Jr | Corning, IA 50841 | $82,402 |
71 | Lynn Thompson | Macksburg, IA 50155 | $82,391 |
72 | Dwaine E Jipsen | Emerson, IA 51533 | $82,155 |
73 | Kuhns Cattle Ltd | Earlham, IA 50072 | $81,907 |
74 | R & S Farms Inc | Farragut, IA 51639 | $81,448 |
75 | Robert James Ticknor Sr | Bridgewater, IA 50837 | $81,445 |
76 | John F Anderzhon Jr | Farragut, IA 51639 | $81,021 |
77 | Mark Lane Babbitt | Malvern, IA 51551 | $80,357 |
78 | Ronald Dale Brown | Diagonal, IA 50845 | $80,279 |
79 | Charles Randall Lund | Corning, IA 50841 | $80,208 |
80 | Scott Palmer | Truro, IA 50257 | $79,812 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”