SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,735
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $42,930,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jeff K Howell | Earlham, IA 50072 | $84,472 |
102 | Michael D Carlson | Emerson, IA 51533 | $84,355 |
103 | Rollin' Hills Farm L L C | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $83,658 |
104 | Wayne Francis Wuebker | Afton, IA 50830 | $83,507 |
105 | Karwal Farms Inc | Elliott, IA 51532 | $83,340 |
106 | Mark Douglas Norton | Bedford, IA 50833 | $82,477 |
107 | Paragon | Little Rock, AR 72211 | $82,130 |
108 | Tiemeyer Farms Inc | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $82,081 |
109 | Charles Alan Slayton | Adair, IA 50002 | $81,548 |
110 | Lisa Deni Carlson | Blanchard, IA 51630 | $80,816 |
111 | Jp & D Farms Inc | Cumming, IA 50061 | $80,430 |
112 | Carl Sidney Johnson | Sidney, IA 51652 | $79,088 |
113 | Marilyn Loughrey Johnson | Sidney, IA 51652 | $79,082 |
114 | Jeff L Porter | Thurman, IA 51654 | $78,061 |
115 | Brett Wayne Stamps | New Market, IA 51646 | $77,853 |
116 | Jay D Sunderman | New Market, IA 51646 | $76,996 |
117 | Mary Ellen Sunderman | New Market, IA 51646 | $76,962 |
118 | Ben Johnson | Winterset, IA 50273 | $76,586 |
119 | Jason Daniel Larabee | New Market, IA 51646 | $76,283 |
120 | Robert Leick | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $76,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”