Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,117
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $30,821,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Matthew Kahnert | Blockton, IA 50836 | $41,718 |
102 | Paul Allen Van Gelder | Kent, IA 50851 | $41,411 |
103 | Connie Cooper | Bedford, IA 50833 | $41,408 |
104 | Carey Stroburg | Maryville, MO 64468 | $41,253 |
105 | Senivac Inc | Greenfield, IA 50849 | $41,160 |
106 | Demott Family Revocable Trust | Bedford, IA 50833 | $40,804 |
107 | Dougherty Farms Inc | Corning, IA 50841 | $40,732 |
108 | Janet Roby-janet D Roby Trust | Indianola, IA 50125 | $40,657 |
109 | Quail Ridge Partners, Lc | Ames, IA 50010 | $40,544 |
110 | Helmuth Dahlke Rev Trust | Omaha, NE 68112 | $40,498 |
111 | Curtis Leo Davison | Clarinda, IA 51632 | $40,430 |
112 | James R Evans | Aurora, IL 60506 | $40,384 |
113 | Edward Allen Drake | Corning, IA 50841 | $40,381 |
114 | Merrill D Frus | Creston, IA 50801 | $40,358 |
115 | Phyllis J Miller-phyllis J Miller Revocable Living | Corning, IA 50841 | $40,202 |
116 | Robert W Odell | Bedford, IA 50833 | $39,961 |
117 | Laura Odell | Bedford, IA 50833 | $39,961 |
118 | Kenneth M Mallas | Corning, IA 50841 | $39,912 |
119 | Gretchen Johnson | Des Moines, IA 50312 | $39,647 |
120 | Carlos E Scott | Rocheport, MO 65279 | $39,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”