Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 537

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $8,629,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
121Bellamy FarmsWinterset, IA 50273$20,402
122Daniel Thomas MorganCorning, IA 50841$20,329
123Larry J KokeGretna, NE 68028$20,272
124Kyle Wesley CarstensFontanelle, IA 50846$20,217
125Mm & D Farms CorpFarragut, IA 51639$20,045
126David Norman KadingCasey, IA 50048$20,006
127Serle KirchnerClarinda, IA 51632$19,954
128A C Fichter JrShenandoah, IA 51601$19,891
129Virgil Norman SmithProle, IA 50229$19,874
130Mark L Laughlin First Revocable TOmaha, NE 68154$19,785
131Virginia I Heng TrustNebraska City, NE 68410$19,731
132David Lee FullerCorning, IA 50841$19,597
133Tritsch Farms IncCouncil Bluffs, IA 51503$19,527
134Steven DriftmierClarinda, IA 51632$19,403
135Wayne R Childers And Geraldine MGretna, NE 68028$19,371
136Mike BarrVillisca, IA 50864$19,265
137Michael O Heng Revocable TrustNebraska City, NE 68410$19,251
138Mellencamp Brothers IncClarinda, IA 51632$19,206
139Cheney Lands CorpNevada, IA 50201$19,021
140Dreher Farms LLCAdair, IA 50002$18,933

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag