Market Gains in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,956
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 3rd District of Iowa (Rep. Cynthia Axne) totaled $33,599,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Justin Owens | Imogene, IA 51645 | $52,866 |
142 | Green Thumb Enterprises | Villisca, IA 50864 | $52,789 |
143 | Arnold Lee Maynes | Corning, IA 50841 | $52,768 |
144 | Brett Wayne Stamps | New Market, IA 51646 | $52,758 |
145 | Kit C Johnson | Stanton, IA 51573 | $52,745 |
146 | Donald Lynn Gohlinghorst | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $52,705 |
147 | Warren Miller | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $52,482 |
148 | John Stouder | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $52,471 |
149 | Charles E Vestal | Emerson, IA 51533 | $52,341 |
150 | Terry Lee Lundquist | Corning, IA 50841 | $52,210 |
151 | Darwin Hanson | Villisca, IA 50864 | $51,962 |
152 | Dennis Schroeder | Malvern, IA 51551 | $51,714 |
153 | Loewe Enterprises Inc | Sidney, IA 51652 | $51,542 |
154 | Raymond Joseph Gaesser | Corning, IA 50841 | $51,217 |
155 | Charles Dee Mccomb | Shenandoah, IA 51601 | $50,567 |
156 | James O Driskell | Malvern, IA 51551 | $50,478 |
157 | R J Benton Farms Inc | Tabor, IA 51653 | $50,320 |
158 | Lawrence Dean Westphal | Fontanelle, IA 50846 | $50,309 |
159 | Gary Wayne Swank | Lenox, IA 50851 | $49,455 |
160 | Kirk Donald Brandt | Corning, IA 50841 | $49,095 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”