Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,237
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $98,102,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $1,420,640 |
2 | , | $250,000 | |
3 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $173,543 |
4 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
5 | Miller Bros Farm Partnership | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $109,073 |
6 | A J M Farms | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $104,293 |
7 | Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa | Ames, IA 50010 | $99,454 |
8 | Cynthia Ferris | Onawa, IA 51040 | $89,399 |
9 | Nelson-doneskey Farms | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $86,014 |
10 | Thurston Farms | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $83,377 |
11 | David M Patz | Manson, IA 50563 | $76,035 |
12 | Eleanor Moeckly | Nevada, IA 50201 | $75,834 |
13 | Karen L Stuart-karen L Stuart Revocable Trust | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $73,486 |
14 | Beth N Lau | Cushing, IA 51018 | $70,540 |
15 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $70,457 |
16 | Duane And Nathan Meyer Joint Venture | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $69,754 |
17 | Doug Young Family Farms Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $69,664 |
18 | Joan L Heinle | Whiting, IA 51063 | $69,204 |
19 | Cindy S Bakke | Sloan, IA 51055 | $67,910 |
20 | Young Trust Dated 5/17/94 | Oakland, CA 94611 | $67,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>