Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Iowa
(Rep. Steve King)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,141
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $156,706,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joe Joy Inc | Sheldon, IA 51201 | $200,341 |
22 | Jcrop LLC | West Bend, IA 50597 | $195,274 |
23 | Dykstra Dairy | Maurice, IA 51036 | $189,685 |
24 | B & D Dairy LLC | Holstein, IA 51025 | $189,434 |
25 | Sioux Jerseys Llp | Salix, IA 51052 | $188,206 |
26 | Perry Creek Dairy LLC | Merrill, IA 51038 | $181,590 |
27 | Plymouth Dairy Farms Inc | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $181,052 |
28 | Vander Waal Bros Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $181,000 |
29 | Tyler Widman | Lawton, IA 51030 | $178,719 |
30 | Peter J Stallman | Everly, IA 51338 | $174,701 |
31 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $173,731 |
32 | Keith Jacobs | Sanborn, IA 51248 | $172,194 |
33 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
34 | Salix Farms Llp | Salix, IA 51052 | $169,767 |
35 | Jeffrey Chindlund Farm | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $169,334 |
36 | , | $161,502 | |
37 | Nyhof Dairy Inc | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $159,865 |
38 | Andrew Lee Butcher | Holstein, IA 51025 | $159,515 |
39 | Peter Junior Hoogland | Maurice, IA 51036 | $158,303 |
40 | Dean A Moser | Danbury, IA 51019 | $157,671 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”