Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,585
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $9,552,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mobo Farms Inc | Hull, IA 51239 | $20,159 |
62 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $20,015 |
63 | Shallow Creek Farms, Inc. | Inwood, IA 51240 | $19,705 |
64 | Krystal L Doolittle | Williams, IA 50271 | $19,353 |
65 | Shellee Barto | Moville, IA 51039 | $19,270 |
66 | Jacquelyn Fonken | Williams, IA 50271 | $19,088 |
67 | Adam Victor Donald Harvey | Goldfield, IA 50542 | $19,065 |
68 | M B N Farms Inc | Humboldt, IA 50548 | $19,001 |
69 | Maassen Farm Inc | Doon, IA 51235 | $18,891 |
70 | Harle Family Farms Inc | Kanawha, IA 50447 | $18,744 |
71 | Jdras Ltd | Goldfield, IA 50542 | $18,569 |
72 | Camden Schroeder | Remsen, IA 51050 | $18,527 |
73 | Revbco Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $18,483 |
74 | Gradert & Sons LLC | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $18,465 |
75 | 4k Farms Inc | Dumont, IA 50625 | $18,397 |
76 | Brady Wynia | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $18,343 |
77 | Roxanne R Anderson | Williams, IA 50271 | $18,261 |
78 | , | $18,245 | |
79 | Btk Farms Inc | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $18,141 |
80 | Legacy Ag Inc | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $17,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”