Conservation Reserve Program in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 13,237
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $98,102,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronnie Fitzloff Testamentary Trust | Spencer, IA 51301 | $50,000 |
62 | Charlene J Radcliffe | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $50,000 |
63 | Jane Anna Howard Tr 07282011 | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $50,000 |
64 | John H Grieme Trust | Schaller, IA 51053 | $50,000 |
65 | Linda Adkins | Sloan, IA 51055 | $50,000 |
66 | Nancy Sanderson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $50,000 |
67 | , | $50,000 | |
68 | , | $50,000 | |
69 | Jean Marie Becker | Algona, IA 50511 | $49,997 |
70 | Vonda Anfinson | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $49,997 |
71 | Allen Olson Family Farm LLC | Manilla, IA 51454 | $49,996 |
72 | Joleen E Nelson | Wellington, OH 44090 | $49,990 |
73 | P & R Trust | Hartley, IA 51346 | $49,937 |
74 | Gk Christiansen LLC | Denison, IA 51442 | $49,896 |
75 | Ronald Edward Becker | Algona, IA 50511 | $49,894 |
76 | Julian B Chestelson | Dallas Center, IA 50063 | $49,888 |
77 | Mary A Hieber Revocable Trust | Moorhead, IA 51558 | $49,879 |
78 | Lakeport Farms LLC | Salix, IA 51052 | $49,868 |
79 | Rural Water System No 1 | Hospers, IA 51238 | $49,862 |
80 | Thomas P Mc Bride | Danbury, IA 51019 | $49,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”