Total Disaster Programs in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,074
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $55,668,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tom J Nedved | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $81,146 |
62 | Jill Nedved | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $81,145 |
63 | Marksmen Farms LLC | Milford, IA 51351 | $80,034 |
64 | Heebner Farms | Estherville, IA 51334 | $79,822 |
65 | Collen Farms Inc | Dayton, IA 50530 | $79,091 |
66 | Daniel Lee Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $78,869 |
67 | David Folsom | Hornick, IA 51026 | $78,688 |
68 | Michael Dale Schroeder | Lone Rock, IA 50559 | $78,644 |
69 | James A Shimon | Rolfe, IA 50581 | $77,371 |
70 | Soldier Creek Farm Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $76,663 |
71 | Sulsberger Land & Cattle Inc | Hornick, IA 51026 | $76,573 |
72 | Michael Reigelsberger | Rolfe, IA 50581 | $76,432 |
73 | Melissa Kiburz | Winterset, IA 50273 | $76,186 |
74 | Mark James Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $76,046 |
75 | Ann Louise Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $76,044 |
76 | Douglas L Zuehl | Britt, IA 50423 | $75,699 |
77 | Boyd Marvin Quastad | Estherville, IA 51334 | $75,354 |
78 | Mcconnell Family Farm Inc | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $75,075 |
79 | Matthew J Richard | Estherville, IA 51334 | $73,663 |
80 | Linn Lavern Ries | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $73,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”