CCC Organic Programs in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 173
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $285,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael J Mc Neill | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,732 |
62 | Getting Farms Ltd | Sanborn, IA 51248 | $1,728 |
63 | Kyle Schrick | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $1,686 |
64 | Daniel L Myers | Webster City, IA 50595 | $1,670 |
65 | Gregory A Wirtjes | Forest City, IA 50436 | $1,667 |
66 | Jack M Ulicki | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $1,551 |
67 | Hawkeye Pro Power | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $1,514 |
68 | Scatterseed Farms LLC | Mallard, IA 50562 | $1,513 |
69 | Daniel Patrick Haden | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $1,505 |
70 | Kyle Douglas Stensland | Larchwood, IA 51241 | $1,500 |
71 | B & B Ag Llp | Ottosen, IA 50570 | $1,500 |
72 | Scott Ausborn | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,500 |
73 | Philip Hellman | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,496 |
74 | Sara Elizabeth Hanson Pearson | Wesley, IA 50483 | $1,423 |
75 | Driver Farms Ltd | Linn Grove, IA 51033 | $1,406 |
76 | Steven A Amick | Santa Barbara, CA 93105 | $1,344 |
77 | Whiskey Creek Aronia LLC | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $1,282 |
78 | Andrew David Nees | Early, IA 50535 | $1,281 |
79 | Gary Kuhn | Gowrie, IA 50543 | $1,278 |
80 | Shane Richard Wiese | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”