Counter Cyclical Program in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 27,693
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $317,739,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Horan Brothers | Manson, IA 50563 | $138,664 |
22 | Johnson Brothers | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $138,293 |
23 | Neil Lavern Quirin | Alta, IA 51002 | $130,000 |
24 | Phyllis E Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $130,000 |
25 | Roger L Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $129,204 |
26 | Ajs Farms | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $129,046 |
27 | Stanek Brothers Ptnp | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $128,194 |
28 | Brian D Peterson | Lawton, IA 51030 | $126,825 |
29 | Melby Brothers Prtsp | Soldier, IA 51572 | $125,056 |
30 | Meyer Brothers Partnership | Holstein, IA 51025 | $124,952 |
31 | Jorgensen Farms Ptn | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $123,196 |
32 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $121,358 |
33 | Mersch Farm Partnership | Eagle Grove, IA 50533 | $118,904 |
34 | Empire Land & Cattle II | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $118,677 |
35 | Alan Dale Bruhn | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $117,155 |
36 | Mordhorst Hog Farms Prtsp | Soldier, IA 51572 | $109,474 |
37 | Anita Peterson | Lawton, IA 51030 | $109,029 |
38 | S & S Farm Partnership | Woden, IA 50484 | $108,344 |
39 | Gary L Claypool | Hampton, IA 50441 | $108,031 |
40 | Calvin Bruhn | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $107,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”