Wetlands Reserve Program in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Wetlands Reserve Program from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $1,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wetlands Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Terry Allen Stull | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $5,665 |
22 | Webster County Conservation | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $5,529 |
23 | Larry A Braby | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $5,004 |
24 | Monona County Conservation Board | Onawa, IA 51040 | $4,917 |
25 | James D Jorgensen | Forest City, IA 50436 | $4,474 |
26 | Hancock County Conservation Board | Garner, IA 50438 | $4,240 |
27 | Madsen Land Surveying Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $3,916 |
28 | Dewaard Investment Corp | Pella, IA 50219 | $3,781 |
29 | David L Nagle | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $3,695 |
30 | Laurence Hansen | Swea City, IA 50590 | $3,668 |
31 | Eugene Hanson | Houston, TX 77079 | $3,667 |
32 | Shirley R Ramaeker | Eagle Grove, IA 50533 | $3,615 |
33 | Cynthia K Korth | Forest City, IA 50436 | $3,186 |
34 | Florence Sanderson Estate | Estherville, IA 51334 | $2,845 |
35 | Joseph M Minard | Waterloo, IA 50702 | $2,000 |
36 | Dalen R Heida | Spencer, IA 51301 | $1,912 |
37 | Roger Alan Berkland | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $1,786 |
38 | Dean A Ver Mulm | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $1,750 |
39 | Charles Hanson | Pensacola, FL 32507 | $1,671 |
40 | Beadle Trust | Swea City, IA 50590 | $1,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”