Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67,636
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King) totaled $8,328,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Doug Studer Farms | Britt, IA 50423 | $8,560,119 |
2 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $8,200,033 |
3 | H & J Buseman Farms | Belmond, IA 50421 | $7,082,197 |
4 | Empire Land & Cattle II | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $4,798,705 |
5 | A J M Farms | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $4,704,772 |
6 | Beeck Farms | Denison, IA 51442 | $4,520,698 |
7 | Jade Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $4,476,273 |
8 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $4,051,498 |
9 | New Era Partnership | Sac City, IA 50583 | $3,991,691 |
10 | Dejay Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $3,926,975 |
11 | Whiskey Creek Ptn | Lawton, IA 51030 | $3,919,326 |
12 | Haveman Family Farm Ptn | Whiting, IA 51063 | $3,756,906 |
13 | S & S Farms | Pierson, IA 51048 | $3,545,337 |
14 | Stanek Brothers Ptnp | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $3,502,955 |
15 | Multi-rose Jerseys Inc | Rock Rapids, IA 51246 | $3,483,301 |
16 | Weiland Farms | Garner, IA 50438 | $3,439,656 |
17 | Shelton Hay Ag 2019 | Panora, IA 50216 | $3,398,331 |
18 | Gourley Bros L C | Webster City, IA 50595 | $3,345,434 |
19 | Demers Farms | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $3,344,972 |
20 | Flaherty Farms | Pocahontas, IA 50574 | $3,312,233 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>