Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 1st District of Idaho (Rep. Russ Fulcher), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 874
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 1st District of Idaho (Rep. Russ Fulcher) totaled $14,529,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Woodland Apiaries LLC | Moscow, ID 83843 | $607,205 |
2 | Idaho Bee Ranch LLC | Huston, ID 83630 | $603,546 |
3 | Michael D Moore | Craigmont, ID 83523 | $448,231 |
4 | Reisinger Apiaries Inc | Emmett, ID 83617 | $391,281 |
5 | Rhonda Chase | Newman Lake, WA 99025 | $365,034 |
6 | Silverline Bees, LLC | Middleton, ID 83644 | $364,594 |
7 | Anderson Apiaries LLC | Parma, ID 83660 | $346,869 |
8 | Harold E Chase Jr | Newman Lake, WA 99025 | $333,134 |
9 | Jason Escapule | Princeton, ID 83857 | $268,178 |
10 | Judy K Kindall | Payette, ID 83661 | $264,111 |
11 | Jed Steele | Caldwell, ID 83607 | $231,321 |
12 | Charles Kindall | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $222,154 |
13 | , | $205,051 | |
14 | Bee Central, Inc | Mitchell, OR 97750 | $185,762 |
15 | Chad S Moore | Sagle, ID 83860 | $177,153 |
16 | Marianne Lindsey Dba Canyon Cattle | White Bird, ID 83554 | $166,807 |
17 | Phillip G Kindall | Cambridge, ID 83610 | $153,547 |
18 | Heckman Cattle Co | White Bird, ID 83554 | $152,380 |
19 | Bill J Marek | White Bird, ID 83554 | $132,134 |
20 | A L Cattle Inc | Emmett, ID 83617 | $124,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>