Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,215

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $747,340,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21R & M Joint VentureRirie, ID 83443$1,672,275
22Kendall Jones FarmsBurley, ID 83318$1,638,669
23Weston & WestonLogan, UT 84323$1,629,714
24G Hofmeister & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,604,840
25Mcnabb FarmsInkom, ID 83245$1,578,958
26Foster Land & Cattle Co PtrRirie, ID 83443$1,507,060
27Bank Of Commerce **Blackfoot, ID 83221$1,484,425
28Max D Parkinson & Family IncAshton, ID 83420$1,458,311
29Juniper Ridge Ranch IncAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,447,854
30Schorzman Ranch IncMalta, ID 83342$1,376,741
31Abe RogersAshton, ID 83420$1,357,645
32Gregory M WrightArbon, ID 83212$1,342,821
33C L FarmsJackson, WY 83001$1,342,479
34Cleft Of The Rock FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,310,258
35W L Judy Farms PtOrem, UT 84058$1,303,687
36Sage Chicken RanchDeclo, ID 83323$1,282,520
37Flying A Ranch IncAshton, ID 83420$1,274,142
38Chesterfield Land & Livestock AssociationGrace, ID 83241$1,257,240
39Merritt D Neibaur & Sons IncNewdale, ID 83436$1,249,104
40Minidoka LumberPaul, ID 83347$1,235,175

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag