Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 27,020

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $3,212,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Cold Springs Farm PartnershipNewton, UT 84327$3,754,888
42Ruff Times FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$3,730,539
43Keith Wilcox & Sons, IncRexburg, ID 83440$3,710,920
44Grant Neibaur & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$3,662,785
45Kunau FarmsBurley, ID 83318$3,644,253
46Wtr Martin Farms PartnershipBlackfoot, ID 83221$3,443,859
47Faulkner Land & Livestock Co IncGooding, ID 83330$3,436,292
48Webb Basin Dairy, LLCAmerican Falls, ID 83211$3,350,874
49Garth Vanorden FarmsBlackfoot, ID 83221$3,312,890
50Mickelsen FarmsRigby, ID 83442$3,305,209
51Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen PtrRirie, ID 83443$3,304,590
52Woodworth PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$3,299,156
53G Hofmeister & SonsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$3,292,072
54Hartvigsen BrothersCenterville, UT 84014$3,242,086
55Four Brothers Dairy IncShoshone, ID 83352$3,175,508
56Cardene EnterprisesBrigham City, UT 84302$3,175,168
57Bank Of Commerce **Blackfoot, ID 83221$3,131,242
58Salmon Falls Land And Livestock Co IncHagerman, ID 83332$3,083,369
59M H Jones Farm Lc Dba Jones FarmsBurley, ID 83318$3,040,579
60David & Melanie Schwendiman JvNewdale, ID 83436$3,029,730

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag